Skip to content

Newfoundland and Labrador passes law to allow variation of limitation periods and statutory timelines during COVID-19 pandemic

Joe Thorne

On March 26, 2020, the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Act received Royal Assent.

Among other things, that statute brought into force the Temporary Variation of Statutory Deadlines Act (the “Act”).1 The Act addresses concerns in Newfoundland and Labrador regarding expiry of limitation periods and other statutory deadlines during the COVID-19 pandemic response. In particular, the logistical and human challenges in complying with statutory deadlines when courts are closed to all but urgent matters, and clients may not be in a position to address legal matters due to closure, lay-off, or other business interruption.

The Act also applies to deadlines/limitation periods in subordinate legislation, such as Regulations.

In general, the Act empowers:

  • A minister, on the advice of the Attorney-General, to vary a deadline or time period in a statute administered by that minister for up to 6 months;
  • The premier, on the advice of the Attorney-General, to vary a deadline or time period in certain statutes set out in the Executive Council Notice, 20192 for up to 6 months;
  • The Speaker of the House to vary a deadline or time period in enumerated statutes for up to 6 months;
  • The Lieutenant-Governor in Council may, on the advice of the Attorney-General, by order vary a deadline or time period in a statute administered by a minister or the premier for up to 6 months, retroactive to March 14, 2020 if desired.

To determine what statutes are administered by what entity (minister, premier, Speaker), please refer to the Regulations under the Executive Council Act.3 Those Regulations set out the powers of each department and its minister, and include a list of the statutes administered by each minister.

Notice of any variance by a minister, the premier, or the Lieutenant-Governor in Council must be posted:

  • On a government website;
  • In the Newfoundland and Labrador Gazette.

At the date of this update, there have been some variances to deadlines in government-centered legislation, including legislative member financial reporting and public reporting of public sector compensation.

The Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador has made the following recommendations to government for review and action:

  • Under the authority of the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, to extend all limitation periods in the Limitations Act for a period of 6 months retroactive to March 14, 2020;
  • Under the authority of the Minister of Justice and Public Safety, to extend statutory deadlines set out in the:
    • Judicature Act and the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1986;
    • Court of Appeal Rules;
    • Small Claims Act and Small Claims Rules; and
    • Law Society Act, 1999.

The Act, and the permitted variances under it, expires at the end of the next sitting of the House of Assembly. As a result, we anticipate swift action to be taken under the Act.

A further update will follow any developments.


1 SNL 2020, c T-4.02.
2 NLR 93/19.
3 SNL 1995, c E-16.1.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Client Update: Perrin v Blake reaffirms the law on contributory negligence and recovery of damages

April 14, 2016

In a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…

Read More

Client Update: Interest arbitration changes for New Brunswick postponed for further study

April 11, 2016

On Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…

Read More

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top