Skip to content

Newfoundland and Labrador passes law to allow variation of limitation periods and statutory timelines during COVID-19 pandemic

Joe Thorne

On March 26, 2020, the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Act received Royal Assent.

Among other things, that statute brought into force the Temporary Variation of Statutory Deadlines Act (the “Act”).1 The Act addresses concerns in Newfoundland and Labrador regarding expiry of limitation periods and other statutory deadlines during the COVID-19 pandemic response. In particular, the logistical and human challenges in complying with statutory deadlines when courts are closed to all but urgent matters, and clients may not be in a position to address legal matters due to closure, lay-off, or other business interruption.

The Act also applies to deadlines/limitation periods in subordinate legislation, such as Regulations.

In general, the Act empowers:

  • A minister, on the advice of the Attorney-General, to vary a deadline or time period in a statute administered by that minister for up to 6 months;
  • The premier, on the advice of the Attorney-General, to vary a deadline or time period in certain statutes set out in the Executive Council Notice, 20192 for up to 6 months;
  • The Speaker of the House to vary a deadline or time period in enumerated statutes for up to 6 months;
  • The Lieutenant-Governor in Council may, on the advice of the Attorney-General, by order vary a deadline or time period in a statute administered by a minister or the premier for up to 6 months, retroactive to March 14, 2020 if desired.

To determine what statutes are administered by what entity (minister, premier, Speaker), please refer to the Regulations under the Executive Council Act.3 Those Regulations set out the powers of each department and its minister, and include a list of the statutes administered by each minister.

Notice of any variance by a minister, the premier, or the Lieutenant-Governor in Council must be posted:

  • On a government website;
  • In the Newfoundland and Labrador Gazette.

At the date of this update, there have been some variances to deadlines in government-centered legislation, including legislative member financial reporting and public reporting of public sector compensation.

The Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador has made the following recommendations to government for review and action:

  • Under the authority of the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, to extend all limitation periods in the Limitations Act for a period of 6 months retroactive to March 14, 2020;
  • Under the authority of the Minister of Justice and Public Safety, to extend statutory deadlines set out in the:
    • Judicature Act and the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1986;
    • Court of Appeal Rules;
    • Small Claims Act and Small Claims Rules; and
    • Law Society Act, 1999.

The Act, and the permitted variances under it, expires at the end of the next sitting of the House of Assembly. As a result, we anticipate swift action to be taken under the Act.

A further update will follow any developments.


1 SNL 2020, c T-4.02.
2 NLR 93/19.
3 SNL 1995, c E-16.1.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top