The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Changes to the federal pay equity scheme expected in 2018
Brian Johnston, QC and Julia Parent
In response to the report of the House of Commons committee on pay equity, the federal Liberal government announced its intention to bring in legislation to better ensure that all employers in federally regulated sectors have men and women get equal pay for work of equal value (otherwise known as “pay equity”). Pay Equity is significantly different from equal pay for equal work, which is already required throughout Canada. Although New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island have enacted pay equity legislation, that legislation applies only to government bodies/agencies. It is noteworthy that members in the House of Assembly in Newfoundland and Labrador unanimously voted to start the process of enacting pay equity legislation in the province on International Women’s Day 2017.
The big expected change in federal law is to change the current, complaint-based pay equity scheme as set out in the Canadian Human Rights Act, and the Equal Wage Guidelines to a proactive model. Under the current model, while employers must ensure their compensation schemes are compliant so as to avoid a complaint, there are no additional proactive steps that must be taken.
What you need to know.
According to the federal government, the forthcoming legislation “will take a ‘proactive’ approach that’s aimed at helping employers comply with the law rather than forcing employees to lodge complaints about discriminatory wages”.
While there have not been many indications regarding the content of the forthcoming legislation, it will likely resemble the models currently in place in Ontario and Quebec and, if the recommendations in the report of the House of Commons Committee on pay equality are followed, will apply to all federal employers with 15 or more employees.
The proactive pay equity models in Ontario and Quebec require that employers establish and maintain compensation practices that provide for pay equity. The onus is on employers to design a comparison system and compare jobs to ensure that pay equity exists. Once pay equity has been achieved, it must be maintained. There are also posting and reporting requirements that may apply.
Planning for the future.
In light of the forthcoming legislation, which is expected to be tabled in 2018, federal sector employers should familiarize themselves with the “proactive” portions of the Ontario and Quebec pay equity legislation, including the process of comparing jobs, posting, the role of unions and implications for collective bargaining, and the sort of reporting obligations which have created such a stir with the UK’s approach to pay equity.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about how the information or tips above may affect you, please contact any member of our labour and employment group.
Archive
Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…
Read MoreJonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…
Read MoreRick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…
Read MoreBrian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…
Read MoreJonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…
Read MoreOn July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…
Read More