The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Changes to the federal pay equity scheme expected in 2018
Brian Johnston, QC and Julia Parent
In response to the report of the House of Commons committee on pay equity, the federal Liberal government announced its intention to bring in legislation to better ensure that all employers in federally regulated sectors have men and women get equal pay for work of equal value (otherwise known as “pay equity”). Pay Equity is significantly different from equal pay for equal work, which is already required throughout Canada. Although New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island have enacted pay equity legislation, that legislation applies only to government bodies/agencies. It is noteworthy that members in the House of Assembly in Newfoundland and Labrador unanimously voted to start the process of enacting pay equity legislation in the province on International Women’s Day 2017.
The big expected change in federal law is to change the current, complaint-based pay equity scheme as set out in the Canadian Human Rights Act, and the Equal Wage Guidelines to a proactive model. Under the current model, while employers must ensure their compensation schemes are compliant so as to avoid a complaint, there are no additional proactive steps that must be taken.
What you need to know.
According to the federal government, the forthcoming legislation “will take a ‘proactive’ approach that’s aimed at helping employers comply with the law rather than forcing employees to lodge complaints about discriminatory wages”.
While there have not been many indications regarding the content of the forthcoming legislation, it will likely resemble the models currently in place in Ontario and Quebec and, if the recommendations in the report of the House of Commons Committee on pay equality are followed, will apply to all federal employers with 15 or more employees.
The proactive pay equity models in Ontario and Quebec require that employers establish and maintain compensation practices that provide for pay equity. The onus is on employers to design a comparison system and compare jobs to ensure that pay equity exists. Once pay equity has been achieved, it must be maintained. There are also posting and reporting requirements that may apply.
Planning for the future.
In light of the forthcoming legislation, which is expected to be tabled in 2018, federal sector employers should familiarize themselves with the “proactive” portions of the Ontario and Quebec pay equity legislation, including the process of comparing jobs, posting, the role of unions and implications for collective bargaining, and the sort of reporting obligations which have created such a stir with the UK’s approach to pay equity.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about how the information or tips above may affect you, please contact any member of our labour and employment group.
Archive
By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…
Read MoreNew Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…
Read MoreBy Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…
Read MoreNeil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…
Read MoreOn June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…
Read More