Skip to content

The Federal economic response to COVID-19

Brent McCumber, P.Eng.

On March 18, 2020, the Government of Canada announced a significant economic response plan to mitigate the economic impact of COVID-19 on Canadians and businesses.  While this $82 billion plan contains many important measures, in this article we will highlight some of the relief this response plan provides to taxpayers.  In particular, certain tax filing deadlines and tax payment deadlines have been deferred and certain audit activities by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) have been suspended.

With respect to tax filing deadlines, filing due dates for 2019 income tax returns for individuals and certain trusts have been deferred as follows:

  • For individuals, the return filing due date will be deferred until June 1, 2020.
  • For trusts having a taxation year ending on December 31, 2019, the return filing due date will be deferred until May 1, 2020.

With respect to tax payment deadlines, the CRA will allow all taxpayers (including businesses) to defer payment of certain income tax amounts (i.e. tax balances due and instalments owing under Part I of the Income Tax Act) that become owing on or after March 18, 2020 and before September 2020.  It is unclear when payment on these amounts will be required, as the Government merely indicated that it will be “after August 31, 2020”.  As a further measure of relief, the Government has indicated that interest and penalties will not accumulate on these amounts during this “period”.  It is unclear whether this “period” will encompass the time from March 18, 2020 until August 31, 2020 or from March 18, 2020 until the ultimate due date(s) after August 31, 2020.  We emphasize that this deferral only applies to payments of Part I taxes and the interest and penalties on such amounts.  For example, payroll remittances and non-resident withholdings do not benefit from this relief.

With respect to audit activities, the CRA will not contact “small or medium businesses” to initiate certain GST/HST or income tax audits for the next four weeks.  Further, the CRA will temporarily suspend audit interaction with taxpayers and representatives for the “vast majority of businesses”.  While it is unclear what constitutes a “small or medium business” or the “vast majority of businesses”, it is clear that the CRA will be curtailing its audit activities.

This response plan also provides that the CRA will temporarily recognize electronic signatures on certain documents authorizing tax preparers to file returns on behalf of taxpayers.  This is a sensible administrative concession that will help limit in-person meetings between taxpayers and their tax preparers.  It is unclear how long this administrative concession will be in place.

Despite some uncertainty, these relief measures are welcome.  We will provide further updates as more details on these and other tax-related measures become available.


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Tax Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top