Skip to content

Nova Scotia unveils changes to financial hardship unlocking – financial institutions to receive applications starting July 1, 2021

Dante Manna with the assistance of Kali Robertson (summer student)

The Nova Scotia Government recently released regulations reassigning the authority for administering financial hardship unlocking in the province. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will apply directly to their financial institution for approval to withdraw money from a locked-in retirement account (“LIRA”) or life income fund (“LIF”) in circumstances of financial hardship.

Nova Scotia will be the second province in Atlantic Canada, following Newfoundland and Labrador (as noted in our recent Client Update), to streamline the financial hardship unlocking program through financial institutions.

Changes to unlocking

The responsibility of administering financial hardship unlocking applications was previously borne by the Nova Scotia Superintendent of Pensions, as provided under s. 91 of the Pension Benefits Act, S.N.S. 2011, c. 41 (“the Act”) and further detailed in the Pension Benefits Regulations, N.S. Reg. 200/2015 (“Regulations”). However, as a result of Bill 87, Pension Benefits Act (amended) passed by the province on April 19th, 2021, and the newly released amendments to the Regulations, that responsibility effectively shifts to financial institutions as of July 1, 2021.

The government has made some simplifying changes to the criteria and process. Several documentation requirements, such as the requirement to provide recent income receipts, have been loosened, with s. 219 of the Regulations providing the financial institution authority to request any additional documentation it considers “necessary to assist in understanding the documents or verifying their authenticity”. The amended Regulations will allow the withdrawal of the remaining amount, if unlocking leaves the LIF or LIRA balance under $500. Finally, unlocking applications will only be permitted once per “calendar year”, rather than “12-month period”.

On the other hand, for applications where a physician must provide medical advice, the amended Regulations require such physician to be licensed in the jurisdiction where the applicant resides (currently, they may be licensed in any Canadian jurisdiction). Notably, this change also applies to shortened life expectancy unlocking applications, including those made under pension plans.

New required LIRA or LIF terms

Financial institutions should also take note that, effective July 1, 2021, all LIF or LIRA contracts are required to include the following terms (which are deemed for contracts that do not include them):

  • the financial institution is entitled to rely upon the information provided by the owner in an application to withdraw money from their LIRA or LIF;
  • any application which meets the requirements of the Act and Regulations constitutes authorization to the financial institution to make the payment or transfer from the LIRA or LIF in accordance with the Act and Regulations;
  • the value of the assets in the LIRA or LIF owned by the owner on the date they sign an application must be determined using the most recent statement about the LIRA or LIF given to the owner and dated no earlier than one year before the date the owner signs the application; and
  • the financial institution must make the payment to which the owner is entitled no later than 30 days after the date the financial institution receives the completed application and accompanying documents and any additional information provided under s. 219 of the Regulations.

New guidance for financial institutions

Financial institutions are encouraged to consult sections 211 to 230 of the Regulations when reviewing financial hardship unlocking applications. However, the Finance and Treasury Board has provided a comprehensive guide and checklist to further assist financial institutions when processing applications.

Application form

Effective July 1, 2021, all application forms must be submitted to the financial institution holding the funds, and forms given to the Department of Finance will no longer be accepted. There are no substantial changes to the application process under the new version of Form 12; any administrative matters requiring attention are noted in the guide and checklist.

Considerations for plan sponsors and administrators

Financial hardship unlocking still does not apply to money held within a pension fund. Nevertheless, plan sponsors and administrators may still expect inquiries from their members about accessing their pension, thus presenting an opportunity to educate regarding locking-in and withdrawals from retirement savings arrangements.


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top