Skip to content

Nova Scotia unveils changes to financial hardship unlocking – financial institutions to receive applications starting July 1, 2021

Dante Manna with the assistance of Kali Robertson (summer student)

The Nova Scotia Government recently released regulations reassigning the authority for administering financial hardship unlocking in the province. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will apply directly to their financial institution for approval to withdraw money from a locked-in retirement account (“LIRA”) or life income fund (“LIF”) in circumstances of financial hardship.

Nova Scotia will be the second province in Atlantic Canada, following Newfoundland and Labrador (as noted in our recent Client Update), to streamline the financial hardship unlocking program through financial institutions.

Changes to unlocking

The responsibility of administering financial hardship unlocking applications was previously borne by the Nova Scotia Superintendent of Pensions, as provided under s. 91 of the Pension Benefits Act, S.N.S. 2011, c. 41 (“the Act”) and further detailed in the Pension Benefits Regulations, N.S. Reg. 200/2015 (“Regulations”). However, as a result of Bill 87, Pension Benefits Act (amended) passed by the province on April 19th, 2021, and the newly released amendments to the Regulations, that responsibility effectively shifts to financial institutions as of July 1, 2021.

The government has made some simplifying changes to the criteria and process. Several documentation requirements, such as the requirement to provide recent income receipts, have been loosened, with s. 219 of the Regulations providing the financial institution authority to request any additional documentation it considers “necessary to assist in understanding the documents or verifying their authenticity”. The amended Regulations will allow the withdrawal of the remaining amount, if unlocking leaves the LIF or LIRA balance under $500. Finally, unlocking applications will only be permitted once per “calendar year”, rather than “12-month period”.

On the other hand, for applications where a physician must provide medical advice, the amended Regulations require such physician to be licensed in the jurisdiction where the applicant resides (currently, they may be licensed in any Canadian jurisdiction). Notably, this change also applies to shortened life expectancy unlocking applications, including those made under pension plans.

New required LIRA or LIF terms

Financial institutions should also take note that, effective July 1, 2021, all LIF or LIRA contracts are required to include the following terms (which are deemed for contracts that do not include them):

  • the financial institution is entitled to rely upon the information provided by the owner in an application to withdraw money from their LIRA or LIF;
  • any application which meets the requirements of the Act and Regulations constitutes authorization to the financial institution to make the payment or transfer from the LIRA or LIF in accordance with the Act and Regulations;
  • the value of the assets in the LIRA or LIF owned by the owner on the date they sign an application must be determined using the most recent statement about the LIRA or LIF given to the owner and dated no earlier than one year before the date the owner signs the application; and
  • the financial institution must make the payment to which the owner is entitled no later than 30 days after the date the financial institution receives the completed application and accompanying documents and any additional information provided under s. 219 of the Regulations.

New guidance for financial institutions

Financial institutions are encouraged to consult sections 211 to 230 of the Regulations when reviewing financial hardship unlocking applications. However, the Finance and Treasury Board has provided a comprehensive guide and checklist to further assist financial institutions when processing applications.

Application form

Effective July 1, 2021, all application forms must be submitted to the financial institution holding the funds, and forms given to the Department of Finance will no longer be accepted. There are no substantial changes to the application process under the new version of Form 12; any administrative matters requiring attention are noted in the guide and checklist.

Considerations for plan sponsors and administrators

Financial hardship unlocking still does not apply to money held within a pension fund. Nevertheless, plan sponsors and administrators may still expect inquiries from their members about accessing their pension, thus presenting an opportunity to educate regarding locking-in and withdrawals from retirement savings arrangements.


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Proposed reform of Ontario’s labour and employment statutes

May 30, 2017

Mark Tector and Annie Gray This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws. If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would…

Read More

Get ready: CASL’s consent grace period ends July 1, 2017

May 19, 2017

Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”) is a federal law in force since July 1, 2014, aimed at eliminating unsolicited and malicious electronic communications and requires organizations to comply with specific consent, disclosure and unsubscribe requirements when…

Read More

Nothing fishy here: Federal Court dismisses application for judicial review in PIIFCAF case

May 18, 2017

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Kirby Elson had been fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador for about 50 years when the policy on Preserving the Independence of the Inshore Fleet in Canada’s Atlantic Fisheries (“PIIFCAF”) was introduced in…

Read More

Client Update: The Cannabis Act – Getting into the Weeds

May 9, 2017

Rick Dunlop, David Randell, Christine Pound, Sadira Jan and Kevin Landry The federal government’s introduction of the Cannabis Act, the first step in the legalization of marijuana (or cannabis), has understandably triggered a wide range of reactions in the Canadian business…

Read More

The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, SNS 1996, c 7

May 9, 2017

Mark Tector and Annie Gray On April 26, 2017, the Government of Nova Scotia announced that amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, which were passed in May of 2016, will officially come into force as of June…

Read More

Client Update: CPP disability benefits are deductible from awards for loss of earning capacity and loss of income in MVA claims

May 4, 2017

On May 2, 2017, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal issued a significant decision in Tibbetts v. Murphy, 2017 NSCA 35, on the proper interpretation of s. 113A of the Insurance Act. Specifically the issue was whether…

Read More

Protests and injunctions: is the presence of journalists a material fact for the court?

April 24, 2017

Joe Thorne and Amanda Whitehead A fundamental principle of our legal system is that all parties to a dispute should be given the opportunity to be heard. However, the law recognizes that some circumstances warrant speedy judicial…

Read More

Damages for minor injuries in Nova Scotia: a new case on the new cap

April 20, 2017

Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…

Read More

The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – “You gotta have (good) faith” … Terminating without notice during the probationary period

April 19, 2017

Grant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…

Read More

Municipality liable for failing to ensure visitor was reasonably safe in Municipal Public Park

April 19, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top