New Brunswick regulator seeks input on changes to defined benefit pension plan funding
Christopher Marr, TEP & Lauren Henderson
As defined benefit pension plans (“DB Plans”) throughout Canada continue to face funding challenges due to mounting solvency deficits, the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission (“FCNB”) is proposing amendments to the General Regulation (the “Regulation”) under the Pension Benefits Act (“Act”), meant to reduce the volatility of funding requirements placed on plan sponsors and eliminate the need for funding relief measures. Many of the revisions reflect recent amendments in other provinces of Canada, though some differ.
FCNB is seeking public input on the proposed amendments, with a July 13, 2020 deadline for submissions.
Summary of proposed changes:
The following are highlights of the proposed amendments:
- Enhanced going concern funding and introduction of PfAD – The period of time to fund going concern deficiencies has been reduced from fifteen years to ten years. As a new requirement, a provision for adverse deviation (“PfAD”) must be established (applied to liabilities, but not current service cost), and funded in the same manner as the other going concern obligations. The PfAD approach proposed is the same as that recently adopted in Nova Scotia.
- Permanent solvency funding relief – DB plan sponsors will be permitted, on a go-forward basis, to elect to permanently fund their plans to an 85% solvency standard (rather than the current standard of 100%), still with a maximum five-year amortization period. Existing solvency funding exemptions will continue under the new regime.
- Use of letters of credit – Instead of making payments into DB plans to fund solvency deficits, plan sponsors, for plans that are not multi-employer plans, will be permitted to use a letter(s) of credit, so long as it satisfies the requirements set out in the Regulation, including a cap on the total amount of all letters of credit of 15% of the solvency liabilities of the plan. This will provide more flexibility to plan sponsors and diminish the risk of trapped surpluses.
- Governance policy – Plan administrators will now be required to adopt and follow a written governance policy that meets the specific criteria set out in the Regulations, and which generally sets out the structures and processes involved in overseeing, managing and administering the plan.
- Individual Pension Plan (“IPP”) recognition and exemption – New in the Regulation is the recognition of IPPs. It is proposed that IPPs will be exempt from all requirements set out in the Act and Regulations.
The full text of the amendments is available here.
This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions and Benefits group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Mark Tector and Annie Gray This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws. If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would…
Read MoreCanada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”) is a federal law in force since July 1, 2014, aimed at eliminating unsolicited and malicious electronic communications and requires organizations to comply with specific consent, disclosure and unsubscribe requirements when…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Kirby Elson had been fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador for about 50 years when the policy on Preserving the Independence of the Inshore Fleet in Canada’s Atlantic Fisheries (“PIIFCAF”) was introduced in…
Read MoreRick Dunlop, David Randell, Christine Pound, Sadira Jan and Kevin Landry The federal government’s introduction of the Cannabis Act, the first step in the legalization of marijuana (or cannabis), has understandably triggered a wide range of reactions in the Canadian business…
Read MoreMark Tector and Annie Gray On April 26, 2017, the Government of Nova Scotia announced that amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, which were passed in May of 2016, will officially come into force as of June…
Read MoreOn May 2, 2017, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal issued a significant decision in Tibbetts v. Murphy, 2017 NSCA 35, on the proper interpretation of s. 113A of the Insurance Act. Specifically the issue was whether…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Amanda Whitehead A fundamental principle of our legal system is that all parties to a dispute should be given the opportunity to be heard. However, the law recognizes that some circumstances warrant speedy judicial…
Read MoreDamages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…
Read MoreGrant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…
Read More