Skip to content

Client Update: Time’s Ticking: Not-for-Profit Corporations

By October 17, 2014 existing not-for-profit corporations incorporated under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act (the “Old Act”) are required to be continued under the new Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (the “New Act”) or face the possibility of automatic administrative dissolution. For those corporations that are also registered charities, dissolution could mean the revocation of their registration as a charity which could result in substantial tax penalties.

 

FEATURES OF THE NEW ACT

Generally the New Act has been modernized to conform with modern business corporation statutes. The New Act now provides a clear set of rules that govern the internal affairs of corporations under its jurisdiction including clear and coherent statements of member rights, rules regarding members and directors meetings, and provides specific rules regarding fundamental changes (amalgamation, continuance, liquidation and dissolution). The New Act also provides a benefit to those individuals who are acting as directors in that it sets out a due diligence defense for certain liability resulting from director negligence.

There is additional oversight under the New Act including the requirement to submit all bylaws and amendments thereto to Industry Canada. There are also financial reporting requirements under the New Act. For non-soliciting corporations with annual gross revenues in excess of $1,000,000 or for soliciting corporations with annual gross revenues in excess of $250,000, a full annual audit must be conducted. For those soliciting corporations with revenues between $50,000 and $250,000, an audit is required unless the members resolve that a review engagement is sufficient. For non-soliciting corporations with gross annual revenues under $1,000,000 or for soliciting corporations with revenues under $50,000, a review engagement is required unless the members resolve that one is not required. These records must be made available to members, directors and officers of the corporation and to Industry Canada. Soliciting corporations must make their financial records publically available.

 

PROCESS OF TRANSITION

Many of our clients may be involved as a director or in an advisory capacity for a not-for-profit corporation incorporated under the Old Act. We would strongly encourage corporations who have not started the continuance process under the New Act should act now to ensure the process is completed in time. For those corporations incorporated under the Old Act which are also registered charities, additional steps are required – particularly if the charity is looking to amend its purposes as part of the transition for which pre-approval from Canada Revenue Agency can take upwards of two to three months before the continuance process can be started under the New Act.

If your corporation has not yet transitioned, it is a fairly simplified process under the New Act. The corporation must replace its letters patent, supplementary letters patent (if any) and by laws with new charter documents which are in compliance with the New Act. The corporation must submit articles of continuance, forms confirming the initial registered office and first directors of the corporation and a name search confirmation. Bylaws which are in compliance with the New Act can either be submitted as part of the initial package or within twelve months of continuance following approval by the members.

Following successful transition under the New Act, all registered charities (including those who have not amended its purposes and even those who have obtained pre-approval from the Canada Revenue Agency) must submit the certificate of continuance, articles of continuance, various filing forms as well as a copy of the current bylaws and statement of current purposes to the Canada Revenue Agency.

The foregoing is intended for general information only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions, contact one of our Business Lawyers.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

TTC’s Random Testing Decision: A Bright Light for Employers in the Haze of Marijuana Legalization

April 11, 2017

Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…

Read More

Unionization in the Construction Industry: Vacation Day + Snapshot Rule = Disenfranchisement

April 4, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…

Read More

Sometimes a bad deal is just a bad deal: unconscionability and insurance claim settlements in Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13

March 16, 2017

Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…

Read More

Privilege Prevails: Privacy Commissioner protects solicitor-client communications

March 16, 2017

Jonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Nova Scotia Teachers Union & Government – a synopsis

March 7, 2017

Peter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…

Read More

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong: The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador weighs in on the former client rule in commercial transactions

March 1, 2017

Bruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…

Read More

The Ordinary Meaning of Insurance: Client Update on the SCC’s Decision in Sabean

February 21, 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top