Skip to content

Client Update: Changes to the Venture Issuer Regime Effective June 30, 2015

In order to streamline the continuous disclosure obligations of venture issuers, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) are implementing amendments to the national instruments and companion policies listed below, that will come into force across Canada on June 30, 2015, subject to necessary provincial ministerial approvals.

The amendments are intended to improve the quality of information available to investors while reducing the regulatory and disclosure burden on venture issuers. The instruments that have been amended include:

  • National Instrument 51-102, Continuous Disclosure Obligations (“NI 51-102”), and its Companion Policy 51-102CP (“51-102CP”).
  • National Instrument 41-101, General Prospectus Requirements (“NI 41-101”), and its Companion Policy 41-101CP (“41-101CP”).
  • National Instrument 52-110, Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”) (collectively, the “Amendments”).

Canadian venture issuers are issuers that are reporting issuers in a province or territory of Canada that are not listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange or certain other U.S. marketplaces or marketplaces outside Canada and the U.S. and generally include any non-listed reporting issuers or reporting issuers listed the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) and the Canadian Securities Exchange.

Reduced Obligations for Continuous Disclosure
The key amendments to continuous disclosure obligations applicable to venture issuers are as follows:

  • Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of interim financial statements. Venture issuers will be permitted to file an interim MD&A in a “quarterly highlight” format. This format would include a short discussion of all material information about the issuer’s operations, liquidity and capital resources, including an analysis of the issuer’s financial condition, and such other requirements in accordance with an amended Form 51-102F1. The option to provide quarterly highlights will apply in respect of issuers’ financial years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.

    The CSA indicates that quarterly highlights will likely satisfy the needs of investors in smaller venture issuers. However, venture issuers with “significant revenue” will want to consider continuing to use the full interim MD&A to assist their investors in making informed investment decisions. The “significance” threshold of a venture issuer’s revenue is not defined by the new amendments, so this determination will remain open to the issuer’s interpretation and issuers are encouraged to consider their investor’s needs in deciding whether to provide quarterly highlights or full MD&A.

  • Executive Compensation. The amendments introduce a new Form 51-102F6V for venture issuers, which will reduce the number of executives for which reporting is required and the reporting period. Under the amendments, only the compensation of the CEO, CFO and next highest paid executive officer will be required to be disclosed by venture issuers, and only for a period of two years. Form 51-102FV6 also introduces thresholds for the disclosure of perquisites received by executive officers and directors, based on their level of salary.

    Under section 9.3.1 of the amended NI 51-102, filing of executive compensation disclosure by venture issuers will be required within 180 days after the issuer’s financial year end, even if the venture issuer has not filed a management information circular. Non-venture issuers must file their executive compensation disclosure within 140 days after the issuer’s financial year end. The new filing deadline for venture issuers will apply in respect of financial years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.

  • Business Acquisition Reporting (“BARs”). Following the amendments, venture issuers will only be required to file a BAR if they acquire a business or group of related businesses in which their consolidated share, investment or advances are more than 100 per cent of the value of the consolidated assets of the venture issuer prior to the acquisition. This represents a modification of the thresholds found in the existing significant asset and investment tests, which have been increased from 40 per cent to 100 per cent by the amendments. The requirement that BARs filed by venture issuers contain pro forma financial statements will also be eliminated.

Audit Committee Composition Requirements
The audit committee composition requirements adopted with the amendments to NI 52-110, impose more stringent requirements on venture issuers. As a result of the changes, the audit committee of venture issuers will be required to have at least three members, the majority of whom are not executive officers, employees or control persons of the issuer or any affiliate of the issuer. The new audit composition requirements will apply in respect of financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2016. These amendments are consistent with the existing TSXV requirements for audit committees composition, so this change will not be as onerous for TSXV listed issuers.

There are a number of time limited exceptions to this rule to allow issuers to temporarily fill vacancies caused by events which are outside the control of a member of the committee, or vacancies which occur due to the death, disability or resignation of a member.

Reduced Obligations for IPO Prospectus Disclosure
For the purposes of an initial public offering by an issuer that will become a venture issuer, issuers will only be required to disclose audited financial statements for the previous two completed financial years instead of the existing three year requirement for all issuers. Additionally, certain disclosure mandated in prospectuses for public offerings by venture issuers will also be scaled back as a result of the above rule changes (i.e., reduced interim MD&A and executive compensation disclosure).

The foregoing is a summary only and intended for general information. If you have any questions, comments or concerns respecting the CSA amendments please contact one of the following members of our securities group:

Andrew Burke
902.420.3395
aburke@stewartmckelvey.com

Gavin Stuttard
902.444.1709
gstuttard@stewartmckelvey.com

Tauna Staniland
709.570.8842
tstaniland@stewartmckelvey.com

Eric MacRae
902.420.3323
emacrae@stewartmckelvey.com

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Client Update: Perrin v Blake reaffirms the law on contributory negligence and recovery of damages

April 14, 2016

In a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…

Read More

Client Update: Interest arbitration changes for New Brunswick postponed for further study

April 11, 2016

On Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…

Read More

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top