Skip to content

Government of Canada announces changes to Employment Insurance and Work-Share Program as part of $1 billion COVID-19 fund

Jennifer Thompson

As employees and employers grapple with the practical implications of a potential COVID-19 outbreak, the Government of Canada has stepped up to the plate with an announcement of a $1 billion fund to finance a range of measures aimed at limiting the spread of the virus and preparing the country for what seems like an inevitable wider outbreak across Canada.

One of the announced measures, which will ease concerns of many employees, is waiving the mandatory one week waiting period for Employment Insurance (“EI”).  The impact of this is that employees who are unable to work due to COVID-19 will now be able to claim EI from the first day of sickness, rather than having to wait a week before they can receive any payments.  This measure will also benefit those who are in quarantine or who have been directed to self-isolate as a precaution.  This may not apply to those who voluntarily self-isolate without direction from public health officials, but may cover those asked to quarantine by their employer where this measure was recommended by public health officials.  At this stage, it is also unclear what documentation would be required.  Unfortunately, this announcement does not address those not eligible for EI sickness benefits; however, the government has confirmed that it will be considering what help may be available to those individuals, including income support.

The announcement also included enhancements to the Work-Sharing program.  This is a program “designed to help employers and employees avoid layoffs when there is a temporary reduction in the normal level of business activity that is beyond the control of the employer. The measure provides income support to employees eligible for Employment Insurance benefits who work a temporarily reduced work week while their employer recovers.”¹ Ordinarily, this program can be used for a maximum of 38 weeks, however, this has now been extended to 76 weeks to help employers and employees during any economic downturn as a result of COVID-19.  It should be noted that both the employer and employee must agree to the Work-Sharing arrangement.

The other measures included in the $1 billion package include:

  • $50m to the Public Health Agency of Canada for public education and communications;
  • $550m to the provinces and territories for “critical health care system needs” in support of its statement that financial considerations will not and should not be an obstacle to the necessary preparations;
  • $100m for federal health measures, including supporting the preparations of the First Nations and Inuit communities;
  • $275m towards research into COVID-19, including vaccines and potential treatments;
  • $50m to the Public Health Agency of Canada for purchases of personal protective equipment for the provinces and territories; and
  • $50m to the World Health Organization to support global efforts.

The full statement from the Government of Canada can be found here.


¹ Employment and Social Development Canada, https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/work-sharing.html


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top