Skip to content

COVID-19 vaccination soon to become mandatory in all federally regulated workplaces in Canada

Brian Johnston, QC and Katharine Mack

COVID-19 vaccination policies have become more prevalent. Public sector employees have been mandated to get vaccinated in a number of jurisdictions, the federal government has mandated vaccinations in the marine and transportation industries, and some provincial governments have required vaccination in other high-risk sectors such as healthcare. Additionally, many private sector employers have voluntarily established vaccination requirements for employees and patrons.

Most recently, the federal government announced that it is developing COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations under the Canada Labour Code, which would come into effect in early 2022. The regulations would require that employees be vaccinated across all federally regulated industries, including banking, broadcasting and telecommunications. Indigenous Governing Bodies and First Nation Band Councils will be exempt in recognition of the right to self-determination and self-government.

If enacted as announced, the COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations will require that federally regulated employers verify vaccination status of all employees – affecting approximately 955,000 employees across Canada. Exemptions would be available to employees for reasons protected by the Canadian Human Rights Act. Employers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement could be subject to administrative monetary penalties.

Last week, there were a few days of consultations with select federal employers and associations. As well a consultation paper has been released.

Concerns have been expressed with this federal initiative including the expected negative impact on industries where labour is already in short supply (e.g. transportation). Some have suggested the Saskatchewan approach as an alternative where employers have the option but are not required to implement mandatory vaccinations. In Saskatchewan, for those employers who opt to implement a policy, legislation and regulations broadly backstops them so long as their actions in implementing and administering the mandatory vaccination policies and other measures are carried out in good faith, whether reasonable or not.

Concerns have also been raised with respect to lack of meaningful engagement, guidance and clarity from the federal government. For example, there have been ongoing challenges for employers in navigating exemption requests on the basis of human rights grounds including disability and religion. While these issues are complex and sometimes emotional, federal employers have been left to respond to these requests in the absence of meaningful guidance from the government nor any promise of a legal backstop to protect employers from legal challenges where they have acted in good faith.

If you have questions, or would like to implement a vaccination policy tailored to your organization, please reach out to a member of our Labour and Employment Group for assistance.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top