Skip to content

COVID-19 vaccination soon to become mandatory in all federally regulated workplaces in Canada

Brian Johnston, QC and Katharine Mack

COVID-19 vaccination policies have become more prevalent. Public sector employees have been mandated to get vaccinated in a number of jurisdictions, the federal government has mandated vaccinations in the marine and transportation industries, and some provincial governments have required vaccination in other high-risk sectors such as healthcare. Additionally, many private sector employers have voluntarily established vaccination requirements for employees and patrons.

Most recently, the federal government announced that it is developing COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations under the Canada Labour Code, which would come into effect in early 2022. The regulations would require that employees be vaccinated across all federally regulated industries, including banking, broadcasting and telecommunications. Indigenous Governing Bodies and First Nation Band Councils will be exempt in recognition of the right to self-determination and self-government.

If enacted as announced, the COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations will require that federally regulated employers verify vaccination status of all employees – affecting approximately 955,000 employees across Canada. Exemptions would be available to employees for reasons protected by the Canadian Human Rights Act. Employers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement could be subject to administrative monetary penalties.

Last week, there were a few days of consultations with select federal employers and associations. As well a consultation paper has been released.

Concerns have been expressed with this federal initiative including the expected negative impact on industries where labour is already in short supply (e.g. transportation). Some have suggested the Saskatchewan approach as an alternative where employers have the option but are not required to implement mandatory vaccinations. In Saskatchewan, for those employers who opt to implement a policy, legislation and regulations broadly backstops them so long as their actions in implementing and administering the mandatory vaccination policies and other measures are carried out in good faith, whether reasonable or not.

Concerns have also been raised with respect to lack of meaningful engagement, guidance and clarity from the federal government. For example, there have been ongoing challenges for employers in navigating exemption requests on the basis of human rights grounds including disability and religion. While these issues are complex and sometimes emotional, federal employers have been left to respond to these requests in the absence of meaningful guidance from the government nor any promise of a legal backstop to protect employers from legal challenges where they have acted in good faith.

If you have questions, or would like to implement a vaccination policy tailored to your organization, please reach out to a member of our Labour and Employment Group for assistance.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top