Skip to content

COVID-19 vaccination leave for employees

Mark Tector and Bhreagh Ross

With vaccine rollout well underway across the country, employers should be aware of legislative changes that entitle employees to paid or unpaid time-off to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Here are the two Canadian jurisdictions that currently offer specific leave protections for employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine:

Province Vaccine leave legislation Provision
British Columbia Unpaid, job-protected leave to be vaccinated or to take a dependent family member to be vaccinated S. 52.12(2), Employment Standards Act; s. 45.03(2(b), Employment Standards Regulation
Saskatchewan Three hours paid, job-protected leave to be vaccinated S. 6-22.1, The Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, 2020

Currently, none of the Atlantic Provinces have enacted specific legislation dealing with leave time for employees to be vaccinated, but it is undoubtedly a topic of conversation for many provincial policymakers.  In some provinces employees may use other statutory leaves to take time off to get the vaccine.  For example, employees in Nova Scotia have a statutory entitlement to three (3) unpaid sick days a year that can be used for such things as medical appointments, including a medical appointment to receive the vaccine.

While pandemic policies are ever-changing, as an employer, it is important to be mindful of your province’s leave requirements when it comes to allowing and encouraging employees to take time off work to get the vaccine as it becomes available.

As part of their policies addressing COVID-19, employers should consider their approach to vaccine leave time, especially as the vaccine becomes more readily available.  Internal policies should also account for dosage needs given that three of the four vaccines currently approved for use in Canada require two doses to be effective. Through proactive vaccine leave policies, employers have the opportunity to send a strong message about the importance of vaccination, which plays a key role in controlling the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the broader community.

One of the members of our Labour and Employment group would be happy to answer any questions you have regarding your COVID-19 policy, including leave time for employees to be vaccinated.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour & Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top