Skip to content

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

By Kevin Landry

New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization might look in a particular Province. It is also a useful springboard into this article discussing Provincial acts under the Cannabis Act.

As discussed in our last articles, The Cannabis Act – Getting into the Weeds, and Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!, the Cannabis Act permits provinces to make their own rules when it comes to legalization as long as their legislation meets four criteria set out in subsection 69 of the Cannabis Act:

• Only marijuana legitimately produced under the Cannabis Act may be sold;

• Cannabis may not be sold to persons under the age of 18;

• Provinces are required to keep appropriate records respecting activities in relation to cannabis; and

• Provinces must take adequate measures to reduce the risk of cannabis being diverted to an illicit market or activity.

This means that, similar to alcohol, Canada might soon have nuanced sets of rules governing recreational marijuana in each province – adding to the complexity of legalization efforts.

Some provinces see it as an economic opportunity, while some communities are concerned with the enforcement costs (e.g. impaired driving). Many provinces have stated that they have begun to consider their legislative response and have sought consultation; at this point, only New Brunswick has released an interim report outlining how legalization may look despite the looming legalization date of July 1, 2018 (or sooner).

The devil, as always, is in the details. The following are some of the issues that the Provinces have to consider when formulating their legislative response:

Provincial Decisions on Marijuana Legalization

Age. The Cannabis Act permits the sale of recreational cannabis to persons 18 and older. Provinces have discretion to raise the age if they desire. The Canadian Medical Association (the “CMA”) supports a legal age of 21 for marijuana use, with quantities and potency of marijuana restricted for those under age 25. New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis interim report has recommended a legal age of 19 citing consistency with alcohol laws as a strong influencer of the decision.

Where can Marijuana be Sold? Although the Cannabis Act says that promoting and selling cannabis to persons under 18 is prohibited, Provinces may decide other aspects of the sale of cannabis, such as: who is permitted to sell cannabis, the hours that sellers can remain open, and whether sales are going to be handled by government owned institutions such as provincial liquor commissions or private enterprises. New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis interim report has recommended a crown corporation model over private and mixed public/private sales models. The decision is not surprising given Marijuana’s potential tax revenue is immense, and given that Ontario annually makes $1.8 billion in tax revenue from liquor sales; provinces understandably see immense revenue opportunities in marijuana.

Price. A controversial and polarizing issue: how much will legal marijuana cost to buy? Hailed as a government cash cow in Colorado where government tax revenue from marijuana eclipsed $200 million in 2016, there is significant interest from government finance departments in charging a premium for this new commodity. However, opponents argue that the higher the price, the more likely an illicit market will continue to exist. New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis interim report also contemplates preventing bulk purchase discounts and incentive programs.

Tax Breaks. Will some jurisdictions be giving tax breaks or incentives for producers, sellers, or wholesalers to set up shop? None have said so thus far. The federal government also has not yet revealed the exact taxation scheme for recreation marijuana, but a 2016 report by CIBC World Marketscorrectly points out that there is a “sin-tax” placed on similar goods such as alcohol or cigarettes.

Tourism Hotspots. 18 million tourists visited Canada in 2015, a majority of whom were Americans. With potential cannabis tourism dollars on the line, which provinces or municipalities are willing to reinvent themselves as the Amsterdam of the North? Some would argue, that the front runner is Vancouver which is already host to a variety of cannabis culture hot spots such as the New Amsterdam Café – a smoke friendly establishment operating since 2000. While not every province has been as accepting of marijuana in the same fashion as British Columbia, there might be newfound temptation for provinces to permit smoking cafés or other amusements in order to entice visits from tourists.

Unified or Secular approaches to Governance? There is talk in the Atlantic Provinces of creating a unified approach to cannabis regulation across the Atlantic region, or so said the newly elected Premier of Nova Scotia, during the May election campaign. A unified regime might lead to licenses that span several provinces, which would be enticing for start-ups; however, as evidenced by personal property and security regimes, there are challenges in keeping consistency across jurisdictions even if the intent is to have uniform laws.

Enforcement. Increased costs associated with policing and governing legalized marijuana, particularly impaired driving offenses, are front of mind for some municipalities like Charlottetown. Police will require training in order to test for marijuana impairment, and police forces will require new equipment and procedures, but paying for it will eat into the budget of many already strained communities who, as of yet, have no claim to the revenues created by legalized marijuana.

Public Health. Reducing the harms and risks of legalized cannabis is paramount to most Provincial governments. Targeted public education ads and focused school education programs are both contemplated in the New Brunswick Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis interim report.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top