Skip to content

Client Update: Proposed reform of Ontario’s labour and employment statutes

Mark Tector and Annie Gray

This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws.

If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would usher in a range of amendments to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) and Labour Relations Act (“LRA”).

Underlying recommendations

The proposed changes come in response to the final report of the Changing Workplaces Review, which was released on May 23, 2017 and contains a total of 173 recommendations.

First commissioned in 2015, the Review was touted as Canada’s first-ever independent review of employment standards and labour relations statutes in a single process.

The Review responds to concerns it identified in the current labour market, including precarious work, income disparity between part-time and full-time workers and the disproportionate impact of those realities on women, youths, seniors and ethnic minorities.

Proposed changes

If passed, highlights from the proposed legislation include the following:

Employment Standards

Minimum wage increase

  • To $14/hour as of January 1, 2018 and $15/hour as of January 1, 2019, with annual increases thereafter at the rate of inflation (currently, the minimum wage in Ontario is $11.40/hr).

Equal pay for equal work

  • Casual, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees would be paid the same wage as full-time employees when performing the same job for the same employer.
  • Temporary Help Agency employees would be guaranteed pay equal to the client’s permanent employees for the same job.
  • All employees would be protected from reprisal for making wage inquiries.
  • Exceptions to the general rule would exist for wage differences based on systems of seniority, merit or measures of production.
  • If passed, these proposals would come into effect as of April 1, 2018.

Termination of temporary assignment

  • Temporary Help Agencies would be required to provide at least one week’s notice when an assignment originally scheduled to last longer than 3 months will be terminated early.
  • If less than one week’s notice is provided, the employee will have to be paid the difference unless s/he is offered reasonable work of at least one week’s duration during the notice period.
  • This proposal would come into force, if passed, as of January 1, 2018.

Scheduling

  • Employees with more than 3 months of employment would be entitled to request scheduling or location changes with protection against reprisal.
    • If less than 4 days’ notice is given, employees can refuse to accept shifts.employees would need to be paid 3 hours at their regular wage:
    • when given less than 3 hours upon reporting to work (if the employee regularly works in excess of 3 hours per day).
    • when a shift is cancelled less than 48 hours in advance.
    • for every 24 period in which they are on-call but not called in to
      work.
  • This proposal would come into effect on January 1, 2019.

Employee misclassification

  • Employers who inaccurately classify employees as independent contractors would be subject to specific penalties including prosecution, public disclosure of convictions and fines.
  • Where proper classification is in dispute the employer would bear the burden of proof.
  • There will be no change to the ESA definition of “employee” to specifically include “dependant contractors.”

Related employer provision

  • Ontario’s related employer provision would no longer require that the “intent or effect” of the business arrangement be to defeat the purpose of the ESA.

Vacation and holiday pay

  • Employees with more than 5 years of employment with the same employer would be entitled to 3 weeks of paid vacation (currently, it is 2 weeks with no increase over time).
  • The formula for calculating holiday pay would be simplified.
  • Both these changes would take effect as of January 1, 2018.

Paid leaves

  • There would no longer be a 50 employee threshold for entitlement to personal emergency leave.
  • Employees would be entitled to 10 personal emergency days per year, 2 of them paid.
  • There would be a new, separate leave for child death or crime-related disappearance, with a maximum duration of 104 weeks.
  • Family medical leave would increase from 8 weeks in a 26-week period to 27 weeks in a 52-week period.

Enforcement

  • Enforcement would be enhanced, including with an increase in administrative penalties and publication of information regarding contraventions and accompanying penalties.
  • 175 more Officers would be hired by 2020-21 with the goal of having all claims resolved within 90 days.
  • The province will launch an educational program regarding rights and obligations and provide compliance assistance to employers.

Labour Relations

Certification

  • Card-based certification would apply to temporary help agencies, building services and home care and community services industries.
  • It would be easier for a union to be certified where employers contravene the LRA.
  • There would be easier access to first contract arbitration, as well as a new mediation component.
  • First contract mediation-arbitration applications would be prioritized over displacement and decertification applications.
  • Unions with the support of at least 20% of employees would be provided with employee lists and contact information .
  • The Board would be allowed to conduct votes outside the workplace, including with the use of technology.
  • Officers would be empowered to provide directions regarding the voting process.

Other protections and procedures

  • Successor rights would extend to retendering of building services contracts.
  • Employers would be required to reinstate employees at the conclusion of a strike or lock out.
  • Employers could not discipline or discharge employees without just cause between the time of certification and conclusion of a first contract, or the period between the date when employees are in a strike/lock-out position and the completion of a new agreement.
  • Maximum fines would increase to $5,000 for individuals and $100,000 for organizations.

Statutory exemptions and special industry rules relevant to both employment standards and labour relations will be considered through consultations with stakeholders.

What this means for you

Our clients who conduct business in Ontario need to be aware of these extensive proposed changes for their own workplaces.

More broadly, however, the changes currently proposed in Ontario respond to a labour and employment landscape that is largely shared across Canada and may inform legislative changes in other provinces, including the Maritimes. Alberta has already followed in Ontario’s footsteps by announcing a similar labour and employment overhaul and it is plausible that significant revisions could follow in jurisdictions across Canada.

The foregoing is intended for general information only. If you have any questions about how this may affect your business, please contact a member of our Labour & Employment practice group.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top