Skip to content

Client Update: Nova Scotia Consultation on Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPP) Regulations

On September 9, 2015, the Nova Scotia Department of Finance and Treasury Board opened a consultation on draft Regulations for Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs). The draft Regulations and an FAQ are posted online. PRPPs are voluntary retirement savings plans in which employees and employers may choose to pool contributions and administration costs with other participants. Employers and employees decide how much they contribute to the plan. Third party administrators must be licensed in order to provide PRPPs and several insurance companies are currently licensed federally.

The Nova Scotia Legislature passed the PRPP Act in the fall of 2014 (for more information on the PRPP Act, see a summary here) but it has not yet been proclaimed in force as regulations still need to be finalized. In the PRPP Act, the Nova Scotia government largely adopted the federal Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (Canada); similarly, the proposed Regulations largely mirror the federal Regulations. The differences between the proposed Regulations and the federal regulations include:

  • Different definition of spouse (as adopted in the Nova Scotia PRPP Act).
  • Different options for where the funds in a PRPP may be transferred – The options are consistent with those under the Nova Scotia Pension Benefits Act, which allows transfers to certain locked-in retirement savings arrangements including a locked-in retirement account (LIRA), life income fund (LIF) or life annuity. Conditions for life annuities are similar to those under the new Pension Benefits Regulations, including the requirement of a joint and survivor annuity if the member has a spouse. Limitations on the options are also consistent with expected amendments to the Pension Benefits Act and Regulations that would allow transfers between registered pension plans and PRPPs. Unlike the federal regulations, the proposed Nova Scotia Regulations do not allow transfer to a locked-in registered retirement savings plan (RRSP).
  • In addition to meeting the requirements under the federal legislation, an administrator must register all of their PRPPs under the federal Act before they can be licensed in Nova Scotia.

More information on the federal PRPP requirements is available on the Canada Revenue Agency’s website.

Written comments on the proposed Nova Scotia Regulations may be submitted by October 9, 2015 to: PRPP@novascotia.ca or Finance Treasury Board, Pension Regulation Division, PO Box 2531, Halifax, NS, B3J 3N5.

The foregoing is intended for general information only. If you have any questions, or for a detailed list and background of our Pension and Benefits Team, please visit our website at stewmac.arrdev.ca.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top