Skip to content

Client Update: New Nova Scotia temporary solvency relief for defined benefit pension plans

Level Chan and Dante Manna

On August 9, 2017, the Nova Scotia Superintendent of Pensions announced temporary solvency relief for defined benefit pension plans available effective August 8, 2017. The changes allow pension plan sponsors a one-time option to fund eligible solvency deficiencies over a period up to 15 years, rather than the usual 5-year period. Eligible solvency deficiencies are those determined in valuation reports with valuation dates from December 30, 2016 to January 2, 2019 as well as existing solvency deficiencies being funded over a 5-year period.

Nova Scotia previously introduced solvency relief measures in February, 2013 (when the amortization period was also extended to 15 years), and November, 2009 (10 years). As previously, plan administrators must notify plan members, former members, retired members and bargaining agents if solvency relief is being sought. Essentially, if one-third of the plan members, former members or retired members object in writing, the plan cannot take advantage of the solvency relief. Bargaining agents can object or consent on behalf of their members.

The measures were effected by amendments to the Nova Scotia Pension Benefits Regulations, which also apply some new administrative requirements. One is that an administrator must make all required normal cost contributions and remit all employee contributions in order to qualify. There are also additional requirements on the solvency relief reports that must be submitted to the Superintendent, which now must contain:

  • A statement that the administrator proposes to make an extension to the amortization period;
  • The special payments required once the election to extend is made; and
  • The special payments that would have been required if the election were not made.

Plan members must also be advised that interest on the solvency liabilities will also be amortized and be given the start and end dates of the amortization period.

Relief was also previously provided for Nova Scotia university and municipality pension plans in the form of a permanent solvency exemption. New Brunswick municipalities and university plans may be exempted with consent of members, former members and beneficiaries. No other general solvency relief has been announced recently in Atlantic Canada, where the last relief granted in New Brunswick was for deficiencies in 2010-2012 and Newfoundland and Labrador for deficiencies in 2007-2009 and 2010-2013 and for multi-employer plans for 2016-2020.

This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about how the cases or tips above may affect you, please contact our pension and benefits law practitioners such as Level Chan and Dante Manna in Halifax.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top