Skip to content

Client Update: Directors will be liable for unpaid wages and vacation pay

Clients who sit on boards of corporate employers should take note of recent amendments made to New Brunswick’s Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”) which could increase their exposure to personal liability in connection with claims advanced by employees of the corporation.

The amendments, which have already been passed by the Legislature and will come into effect on a date to be determined by cabinet, will impose responsibility on directors for unpaid employee wages and vacation pay. The changes will not be applicable to directors of not-for-profit organizations.

As a result of the amendments, directors will be jointly and severally liable with the corporation for:

  • Up to six months’ wages that were earned or became due and payable while a person was a director.
  • Up to 12 months of vacation pay owing to an employee or former employee that accrued or became due and payable while a person was a director.

Directors may also be liable for payment of certain administrative penalties ranging from $150 to $900.

Given the definitions of “wages” and “pay” contained in the ESA, the potential exists that directors’ liability may extend to employee severance pay, subject to administrative and/or judicial interpretation.

Not only will employees be able to seek enforcement of these new rights against directors through an administrative process existing under the ESA, they may also be able to enforce their rights directly against directors by commencing an action, or even a class action, in court.

Pursuant to the amendments to the ESA, a director’s exposure does not end when he or she ceases to be a director of the corporation. An employee has one year to launch a complaint and an order against a former director can be made up to two years after he or she has ceased to be a director.

Director liability for employee wages has been imposed by business corporations and/or employment standards legislation in other provinces and territories including British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, the Northwest Territories, the Yukon and Nunavut, as well as federally under Part III of the Canada Labour Code. While the details of such legislation vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the legislative framework (including employment standards and corporate statutes) often provides one or more of the following protections for directors:

  • An employee must first seek a remedy against the corporation before he or she can pursue the directors personally.
  • Directors will not be held liable where they have exercised due diligence and acted in good faith (similar to the defence available to directors under the Income Tax Act in connection with the non-remittance of source deductions).

The amendments to the ESA provide no similar protections. Employees will be able to bypass the corporation and seek payment for unpaid wages and vacation pay from directors in their personal capacities, notwithstanding that such directors may have exercised due diligence and acted in good faith. Effectively, the ESA imposes an absolute liability on directors with no express statutory defences.

Currently in New Brunswick, standard directors’ liability insurance policies do not provide coverage for claims advanced by employees for nonpayment of wages and vacation pay. Consequently, depending on the size of the corporation’s payroll, a director could face significant personal liability in the event of corporate insolvency.

The foregoing is intended for general information only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions, visit our Labour and Employment Group. For more on our firm see stewmac.arrdev.ca.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top