Client Update: Changes to the Venture Issuer Regime Effective June 30, 2015
In order to streamline the continuous disclosure obligations of venture issuers, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) are implementing amendments to the national instruments and companion policies listed below, that will come into force across Canada on June 30, 2015, subject to necessary provincial ministerial approvals.
The amendments are intended to improve the quality of information available to investors while reducing the regulatory and disclosure burden on venture issuers. The instruments that have been amended include:
- National Instrument 51-102, Continuous Disclosure Obligations (“NI 51-102”), and its Companion Policy 51-102CP (“51-102CP”).
- National Instrument 41-101, General Prospectus Requirements (“NI 41-101”), and its Companion Policy 41-101CP (“41-101CP”).
- National Instrument 52-110, Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”) (collectively, the “Amendments”).
Canadian venture issuers are issuers that are reporting issuers in a province or territory of Canada that are not listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange or certain other U.S. marketplaces or marketplaces outside Canada and the U.S. and generally include any non-listed reporting issuers or reporting issuers listed the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) and the Canadian Securities Exchange.
Reduced Obligations for Continuous Disclosure
The key amendments to continuous disclosure obligations applicable to venture issuers are as follows:
- Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of interim financial statements. Venture issuers will be permitted to file an interim MD&A in a “quarterly highlight” format. This format would include a short discussion of all material information about the issuer’s operations, liquidity and capital resources, including an analysis of the issuer’s financial condition, and such other requirements in accordance with an amended Form 51-102F1. The option to provide quarterly highlights will apply in respect of issuers’ financial years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.
The CSA indicates that quarterly highlights will likely satisfy the needs of investors in smaller venture issuers. However, venture issuers with “significant revenue” will want to consider continuing to use the full interim MD&A to assist their investors in making informed investment decisions. The “significance” threshold of a venture issuer’s revenue is not defined by the new amendments, so this determination will remain open to the issuer’s interpretation and issuers are encouraged to consider their investor’s needs in deciding whether to provide quarterly highlights or full MD&A.
- Executive Compensation. The amendments introduce a new Form 51-102F6V for venture issuers, which will reduce the number of executives for which reporting is required and the reporting period. Under the amendments, only the compensation of the CEO, CFO and next highest paid executive officer will be required to be disclosed by venture issuers, and only for a period of two years. Form 51-102FV6 also introduces thresholds for the disclosure of perquisites received by executive officers and directors, based on their level of salary.
Under section 9.3.1 of the amended NI 51-102, filing of executive compensation disclosure by venture issuers will be required within 180 days after the issuer’s financial year end, even if the venture issuer has not filed a management information circular. Non-venture issuers must file their executive compensation disclosure within 140 days after the issuer’s financial year end. The new filing deadline for venture issuers will apply in respect of financial years beginning on or after July 1, 2015.
- Business Acquisition Reporting (“BARs”). Following the amendments, venture issuers will only be required to file a BAR if they acquire a business or group of related businesses in which their consolidated share, investment or advances are more than 100 per cent of the value of the consolidated assets of the venture issuer prior to the acquisition. This represents a modification of the thresholds found in the existing significant asset and investment tests, which have been increased from 40 per cent to 100 per cent by the amendments. The requirement that BARs filed by venture issuers contain pro forma financial statements will also be eliminated.
Audit Committee Composition Requirements
The audit committee composition requirements adopted with the amendments to NI 52-110, impose more stringent requirements on venture issuers. As a result of the changes, the audit committee of venture issuers will be required to have at least three members, the majority of whom are not executive officers, employees or control persons of the issuer or any affiliate of the issuer. The new audit composition requirements will apply in respect of financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2016. These amendments are consistent with the existing TSXV requirements for audit committees composition, so this change will not be as onerous for TSXV listed issuers.
There are a number of time limited exceptions to this rule to allow issuers to temporarily fill vacancies caused by events which are outside the control of a member of the committee, or vacancies which occur due to the death, disability or resignation of a member.
Reduced Obligations for IPO Prospectus Disclosure
For the purposes of an initial public offering by an issuer that will become a venture issuer, issuers will only be required to disclose audited financial statements for the previous two completed financial years instead of the existing three year requirement for all issuers. Additionally, certain disclosure mandated in prospectuses for public offerings by venture issuers will also be scaled back as a result of the above rule changes (i.e., reduced interim MD&A and executive compensation disclosure).
The foregoing is a summary only and intended for general information. If you have any questions, comments or concerns respecting the CSA amendments please contact one of the following members of our securities group:
Andrew Burke
902.420.3395
aburke@stewartmckelvey.com
Gavin Stuttard
902.444.1709
gstuttard@stewartmckelvey.com
Tauna Staniland
709.570.8842
tstaniland@stewartmckelvey.com
Eric MacRae
902.420.3323
emacrae@stewartmckelvey.com
Archive
Mark Tector and Annie Gray This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws. If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would…
Read MoreCanada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”) is a federal law in force since July 1, 2014, aimed at eliminating unsolicited and malicious electronic communications and requires organizations to comply with specific consent, disclosure and unsubscribe requirements when…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Kirby Elson had been fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador for about 50 years when the policy on Preserving the Independence of the Inshore Fleet in Canada’s Atlantic Fisheries (“PIIFCAF”) was introduced in…
Read MoreRick Dunlop, David Randell, Christine Pound, Sadira Jan and Kevin Landry The federal government’s introduction of the Cannabis Act, the first step in the legalization of marijuana (or cannabis), has understandably triggered a wide range of reactions in the Canadian business…
Read MoreMark Tector and Annie Gray On April 26, 2017, the Government of Nova Scotia announced that amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, which were passed in May of 2016, will officially come into force as of June…
Read MoreOn May 2, 2017, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal issued a significant decision in Tibbetts v. Murphy, 2017 NSCA 35, on the proper interpretation of s. 113A of the Insurance Act. Specifically the issue was whether…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Amanda Whitehead A fundamental principle of our legal system is that all parties to a dispute should be given the opportunity to be heard. However, the law recognizes that some circumstances warrant speedy judicial…
Read MoreDamages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…
Read MoreGrant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…
Read More