Skip to content

Cautiously inching toward the new normal in Atlantic Courts

Nancy G. Rubin, QC and Erin McSorley

In response to the immense public health and safety challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, Courts across the country have modified their practices and procedures. This article provides an overview of current COVID-19 restrictions and practices implemented by Courts in Atlantic Canada, focused on civil matters. Measures relating specifically to family courts and criminal courts are not considered here.

Essential services model – the first reaction

In response to COVID-19, the Supreme Courts in the Atlantic Provinces each began operating under an “essential services” model in March. Effectively, under such model, the Courts only hear urgent or essential matters. All non-urgent matters are being adjourned. Urgent matters are proceeding primarily by way of telephone or video conference.

Individual judges determine what is urgent or essential based on the facts of the case before them. According to a directive from the Nova Scotia Supreme Court “urgent” includes an emergency or a situation requiring immediate action or attention, while “essential” means “absolutely necessary”, such as documents that must be filed to preserve a limitation period.

In the immediate aftermath, Judges narrowly interpreted “urgent or essential” even if it proceeds electronically. Justice Keith clarified that an “emergency” proceeding “must involve a present or imminent peril which is sufficiently distinct and serious as to merit immediate judicial intervention.” A reasonable apprehension of peril will not suffice.1

A cautious expansion of essential services

There is promising evidence that Courts are expanding the current essential services model.

Nova Scotia now accepts select motions by correspondence, applications that can be dealt with solely in writing, and Consent Orders. The Nova Scotia Probate Court is also now accepting new applications for Grants of Probate and Administration.

In the past week, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court implemented a pilot project to conduct motions and applications via video conference. During the pilot phase, matters will be heard only if all parties are represented by counsel, the hearing is less than four hours, and there is no viva voce evidence or cross-examination on affidavits. It is anticipated these criteria will be relaxed. The Court has successfully heard some virtual proceedings to date.

Further, as of May 4, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court is allowing General Chambers and Appearance Day matters in Halifax to proceed by telephone, with the plan to expand Telechambers to the other districts.

There is also the possibility of some judicial settlement conferences proceeding by way of telephone or video conference at the discretion of the presiding judge and with agreement of the parties.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court has similarly expanded its essential services model to allow filing of the following non-urgent matters: Petitions of Probate, Administration and Guardianship of Estates; bankruptcy and insolvency matters that can be dealt with ex parte or by consent; interlocutory applications that can be dealt with solely in writing; and Consent Orders.

In Prince Edward Island, Courts will accept Consent Orders or Notices of Discontinuance and documents necessary to meet filing deadlines but otherwise, the Courts have asked parties to exercise judgment and file only necessary documents.

All filings continue to be accepted in New Brunswick.

New Brunswick resuming in-person hearings

The New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench recently announced plans to return to a full docket and resume in-person hearings as of June 1, pending any developments in the pandemic. New Brunswick was the first (and only) province to report zero cases of COVID-19 for two weeks. The plan is that, for now, only the Judge, court staff, the immediate parties and their counsel will be permitted to attend, along with members of the media who serve as proxy for the public. Mock trials are being held to determine how to maintain safe distancing in the courtroom.

Appeals

The impact of COVID-19 on Court of Appeal procedures varies across the Atlantic Provinces. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has adjourned all hearings scheduled for the May/June term with the exception of cases determined to be urgent. All non-urgent Chambers matters will also be adjourned.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal is prepared to hear appeals scheduled for May and June via video conference. All previously scheduled applications are proceeding by telephone or video conference, but only new urgent applications will be scheduled.

In Prince Edward Island, the Court of Appeal is exploring telephone or video conference hearings, or decisions based on written facts alone, for appeals scheduled to be heard before the end of May for which pre-hearing filings were completed before March 13. No new, non-urgent appeals will be scheduled.

The New Brunswick Court of Appeal is scheduling perfected appeals to be heard in the usual manner by telephone or video conference. All scheduled motions and status hearings are also being heard by telephone or video conference.

Filing procedures and deadlines

In light of the essential services model, some Courts have suspended procedural filing deadlines. The Nova Scotia Supreme Court has suspended filing deadlines in the Civil Procedure Rules, including deadlines for filing Notices of Defence, Contest, and Judicial Review. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has suspended periods for commencing appeals and for making a motion for date and directions under the Civil Procedure Rules. The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court has extended all time periods in the Rules of Court, including filing, service, or amendment of documents. The New Brunswick Court of Appeal has suspended all time periods under the Rules of Court, with the exception of respondent submissions for perfected appeals or documents regarding scheduled motions or status hearings.

To be clear, these procedural suspensions issued by Courts do not impact deadlines or limitation periods set out in other legislation, unless otherwise varied.

The Newfoundland and Labrador House of Assembly passed the Temporary Variation of Statutory Deadlines Act, SNL 2020, c T-4.02 (the “Act”) and on April 24th, the Lieutenant-Governor in Council made an order under the Act extending most of the limitation periods in the Limitations Act, SNL 1995, c L-16.1. More information is available here.

Further, on April 24th, the New Brunswick Minister of Public Safety issued a renewed and revised Mandatory Order, which suspends limitation periods related to the commencement of proceedings and time limits relating to the conduct of ongoing proceedings. More information is available here.

With limited staffing, courts are finding new ways to deal with the usual paper flow. Courts in all four Atlantic Provinces have made electronic filing available in the current circumstances. Parties are advised to consult the filing directions of the particular Court for instructions on filing procedures.

Courts have also relaxed requirements around swearing affidavits. In Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Courts are accepting affidavits sworn using video technology. Courts in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador will accept unsworn affidavits provided that a sworn copy is filed prior to the hearing or the individual affirms the affidavit evidence at the hearing.

Public access to Court files has been suspended except in urgent situations. Members of the media may request access to files relating to urgent or essential matters. Members of the media are also permitted to attend matters that are proceeding before the Court.

Please visit the following links for more information on Court restrictions and procedures in light of COVID-19:

Nova Scotia

New Brunswick

Prince Edward Island

Newfoundland and Labrador


1 R v Swinamer, 2020 NSSC 133


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top