Pensions & Employee Benefits Update: Nova Scotia pension funding framework & regulatory review
Peter McLellan, QC & Level Chan
In September 2017, Nova Scotia’s Department of Finance and Treasury Board announced that stakeholder input is being sought regarding potential permanent changes to the funding framework for defined benefit pension plans for Nova Scotia.
There is no indication as to any preferred course of action for Nova Scotia; however the discussion paper does summarize what has been done in the past in Nova Scotia – predominantly temporary solvency relief (and permanent solvency relief for certain quasi-public sector plans) – and also references what has been done in other jurisdictions, notable Ontario and Quebec. This is an important opportunity for sponsors of defined benefit pension plans in Nova Scotia to have input on the regime on a go forward basis in Nova Scotia:
- Do we maintain the status quo (full solvency funding)?
- Do we eliminate solvency funding and enhance going concern funding (e.g. the Ontario approach)?
- Do we reduce solvency funding – i.e. from 100% to 85%?
Input is also being sought on a number of regulatory issues including:
- Should Nova Scotia proceed with providing for target benefit plans? If so, should they be restricted to unionized workplaces and should defined benefit plans be permitted to convert to target benefit plans, including accrued benefits?
- What restrictions should apply to annuity buy-outs?
- Should Nova Scotia mirror or adopt recently updated federal investment regulations?
The Province has set a deadline of Friday, November 10, 2017 for stakeholder input.
Our Pensions and Employee Benefits Group would be pleased to discuss this review with you and to assist in any submissions to be made to the Province.
Archive
Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…
Read MoreJonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…
Read MoreRick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…
Read MoreBrian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…
Read MoreJonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…
Read MoreOn July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…
Read More