Skip to content

Employer immigration compliance obligations

Kathleen Leighton

Employers in Canada are obligated to only employ individuals who are legally able to work for them. Individuals who are neither citizens nor permanent residents of Canada, but who wish to work in Canada (“foreign workers”), generally must obtain a work permit.

While some work permits are “open”, meaning they will allow the permit holder to work for nearly any employer and in nearly any role, other work permits are more restrictive. Namely, “employer-specific” work permits limit the permit holder to working for the employer named on the permit, as well as in the position and location specified on the permit. These permits are therefore also less flexible in terms of the permit holder’s ability to move roles or employers.

In order for a foreign national to obtain an employer-specific work permit, it is necessary for employers to take certain active steps to assist, as discussed below.

Relevant programs

There are two main programs through which an individual can obtain an employer-specific work permit:

  1. The Temporary Foreign Worker Program (“TFWP”): The TFWP enables employers to hire foreign nationals to address labour and skill shortages in their business if they are unable to locate suitably skilled and available Canadian citizens or permanent residents.The employer must apply to Employment and Social Development Canada (“ESDC”) / Service Canada for a Labour Market Impact Assessment (“LMIA”). If a positive LMIA is granted to the employer, the foreign national that the employer wishes to hire can use the LMIA to apply for a work permit.

 

  1. The International Mobility Program (“IMP”): The IMP provides opportunities for employers to hire foreign nationals without an LMIA, as certain workers are considered exempt from the LMIA process. There are a number of categories of LMIA-exempt work permits under the IMP, and the majority of them lead to an employer-specific work permit.While an LMIA is not required, the employer must instead prepare and submit an Online Offer of Employment (aka an Employer Compliance Submission) through the Government of Canada’s Employer Portal, and must pay a $230 Compliance Fee, in order to support the foreign national’s application for the employer-specific work permit.

Creation of obligations

By using the TFWP and IMP, employers are agreeing to various conditions, including to remain actively engaged in the business in respect of which the offer of employment was made, make reasonable efforts to provide a work place free of abuse, and comply with relevant employment and recruitment laws, among others.

Additionally, when preparing an LMIA under the TFWP or Employer Compliance Submission under the IMP, the employer is required to outline various conditions of the foreign national’s employment, including details like the individual’s job title, job duties, hours of work, salary or hourly wage, benefits entitlement, location of work, and similar. In providing these details to facilitate a foreign national’s work permit application, the employer is creating obligations to ESDC or Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) respectively to honour those conditions.

Employer compliance

Both ESDC and IRCC have the authority to review the activities of any employer using their programs, including by conducting audits or inspections, in order to ensure the employer is complying with their obligations.

For example, these entities may wish to confirm if an employer is in fact providing the foreign national with the salary indicated in an LMIA or providing the type of work outlined in an Online Offer of Employment. Findings of non-compliance with the conditions of work as provided can lead to various consequences, including warnings, monetary penalties, a ban from using the TFWP or IMP, and more.

Our Immigration Team is able to advise employers of foreign workers regarding their obligations and provide best practices to avoid non-compliance and the consequences that may follow.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top