Client Update: PEI Auto Insurance Reforms: Change is Coming
No really. We mean it this time.
During the Spring 2014 sitting of the legislature, the PEI government passed legislation that will result in significant changes to the standard automobile policy, effective October 1, 2014. Most notably, the amended legislation will:
- Increase no-fault accident benefits (i.e. Section B benefits).
- Increase the “cap” on minor personal injuries.
- Make significant changes to the definition of “minor personal injury”.
The government has also laid the groundwork for a shift to direct compensation for property damage, although direct compensation is not expected to come into effect until sometime in 2015.
- Increase in No-Fault Accident Benefits
No-fault accident benefits available under the PEI standard auto policy are set to increase significantly, mirroring those in New Brunswick. The following benefits will apply to motor vehicle liability policies issued or renewed on or after October 1, 2014:
- Changes to the “Cap” for Minor Personal Injury
The “cap” on non-pecuniary general damages for motor vehicle accidents occurring on or after October 1, 2014 is set to increase to $7,500 – up from the current amount of $2,500. The existing cap of $2,500 will continue to apply to accidents occurring prior to October 1, 2014.
The cap will also be indexed cumulatively in January of each year, beginning in 2016. The maximum recoverable amount will be the amount in place on the date of the accident.
- Changes to the Definition of “Minor Personal Injury”
The amended legislation will not only increase the amount of the “cap” for accidents occurring on or after October 1, 2014, but will also restrict the definition of “minor personal injury” to sprains, strains and whiplash-associated disorders that do not result in a serious impairment. This is a significantly more narrow definition than currently exists in PEI.
The amended legislation also provides guidance on matters relevant to the determination of “minor personal injury”, the assessment of multiple injuries, and the impact of a claimant’s failure to follow reasonable treatment advice.
- Direct Compensation for Property Damage
Although not yet in force, direct compensation for property damage is expected to be in effect sometime in 2015. Fault determination rules have not yet been prescribed.
What This Means For You
Greater benefits will be available for accidents occurring on or after October 1, 2014. These changes may result in new strategic considerations in the defence of auto-related personal injury claims in PEI.
The foregoing is intended for general information only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions, visit our firm website at stewmac.arrdev.ca to contact or learn more about our Prince Edward Island lawyers practicing in the area of Insurance.
Archive
By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…
Read MoreNew Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…
Read MoreBy Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…
Read MoreNeil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…
Read MoreOn June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…
Read More