Skip to content

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry

As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex.

The details of legalization will be in the regulations which are not yet available to the public. The Cannabis Act sets the framework for legalization, but leaves the details to be “prescribed” in the regulations.

In short, the Cannabis Act says that marijuana will be legal to sell and use recreationally. The regulations will tell us almost everything else.

Regulating a new industry is complicated. There are hundreds of policy decisions that need to be made and incorporated into the regulations before the stated legalization date of July 1, 2018 or sooner. In this article, we outline some of the types of policy decisions that have to be made.

What is going to be in the regulations?

Rules about import, export, packaging, storage, sale, possession and disposal of cannabis. The Cannabis Act provides that these activities will soon be legal in some form, so there are numerous important considerations. For example, what will the packaging and storage rules look like with respect to recreational cannabis that can be ingested.

Licensing procedures for import, export, packaging, storage, sale, possession and disposal of cannabis. Licensing is a complicated process. First, some government body will need to take charge of administering the licenses (passport offices? motor vehicle depots?). Then, databases must be set up to collect information for applicants and licensees. To ensure fair and transparent decision making, rules for maintaining licenses, renewing licenses, revoking licenses and awarding licenses will need to be made and circulated. Decisions need to be made regarding what the licenses will cover – is it sufficient to have one license for everything from import to consumer sales? Or is it better to have separate licenses for each activity? Colorado has created separate licenses for retail stores, cultivation, product manufacturing, testing and transporting.

How to implement the cannabis tracking system in Part 6 of the Cannabis Act. Tracking other controlled substances is crucial to ensuring they are not going to illicit activities (an explicit goal of the Cannabis Act). To overcome these challenges, Colorado has made a requirement for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tracking of marijuana in their jurisdiction and has rules about data input at retail stores. Tracking is also important for collecting data, which can be utilized to improve and evaluate the effectiveness of the Cannabis Act; but part of the challenge is determining what to track. Andrew Freedman, Colorado’s former Director of Marijuana Co-ordination, outlined the importance of designing good data gathering metrics in a recent interview:

One of the things we didn’t do as well as we could have is set great baseline data. We were not measuring some things that were really important to us, like, how many kids were being suspended from school for marijuana? We were not measuring that, which meant we didn’t have a way to know if that changed after we legalized. … Making sure you’re measuring things that matter to you so you can change policy along the way is really important.

Composition and strength of cannabis. The appropriate composition and strength of cannabis being sold for recreational use is fraught with debate and converging interests. The Centre for Mental Health and Addiction has stated that “High potency cannabis – that is, cannabis with a high concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of cannabis – places users at higher risk of mental health problems than low-potency cannabis”. The Canadian Medical Associationadvocates for the legal age to be set at 21, with quantities and potency of marijuana restricted for those under age 25. The rationale for this stance is that brain development only finalizes at age 25.

Procedures for Quality Control. The Cannabis Act aims to “protect public health and public safety by establishing strict product safety and product quality requirements”. So, like alcohol, quality control will be necessary to avoid the equivalent of the “moonshine days.”

Prescribing forms for the purposes of the Act. Simply designing all the standard forms associated with legalization is a gargantuan task. Careful consideration must be made as to what data is collected, how the forms can be accessed and what form licenses will take.

Acceptable display of cannabis. Displaying cannabis must be done in a manner that will keep it safe to consume, but not be open and appealing to youth. For example, in Nova Scotia, tobacco has been regulated under the Tobacco Access Act and regulations. Some restrictions require visible display of door decals or point of purchase identification signs being displayed by vendors. Tobacco products are also not allowed to be visible from outside the store and must be stored in opaque counters or cabinets. The regulations in Nova Scotia are exacting – even dictating the maximum size of signs and lettering as well as what colors may be used. For tobacco there are different considerations and display rules for vendors and tobacconists – which leaves the door open for specialty marijuana purveyors.

Determining prohibited terms, expressions, logos, symbols or illustrations. The Cannabis Act prohibits the use of prescribed terms in promotions or packaging of cannabis and cannabis accessories. The question here is what will the government prohibit? Given the similarities of the Cannabis Act and Tobacco Act, it would not be surprising to see detailed regulations outlining the size of logos and brand elements on marijuana packaging or a requirement to include a health warning in a similar fashion to the Tobacco Products Labelling Regulations (Cigarettes and Little Cigars).

Recall orders. As with any product for consumers, there will inevitably be recalls of marijuana once it is sold to consumer; some recalls have already occurred in the medical cannabis industry. The regulations will have to address what information is disclosed to the public and what systems producers and sellers need to have in order to enable recalls of potentially harmful product.

Fixing penalties, and fines for violations of the Act or regulations, and the cost of licenses. Everything has a cost; licenses to sell and distribute marijuana will be no exception. This is an area of particular interest to many since some provinces like New Brunswick see the newly legalized marijuana industry as significant revenue source. Colorado lists a variety of licensing fees in their legislation ranging from US $200 -US $6,000.

What information about the cannabis the seller or distributor must make available to the public. Food has to display nutritional information, alcohol must display alcohol content, but what information do consumers need to know about marijuana? The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health suggests the THC And CBD (Cannabidiol) content at minimum should be displayed on recreational marijuana. It is also important to consider what information should be kept from consumers. The Tobacco Products Labelling Regulations (Cigarettes and Little Cigars) has exacting requirements, which necessitate the inclusion of health messages and limitation on the size of logos and branding information on tobacco products.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Proposed reform of Ontario’s labour and employment statutes

May 30, 2017

Mark Tector and Annie Gray This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws. If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would…

Read More

Get ready: CASL’s consent grace period ends July 1, 2017

May 19, 2017

Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”) is a federal law in force since July 1, 2014, aimed at eliminating unsolicited and malicious electronic communications and requires organizations to comply with specific consent, disclosure and unsubscribe requirements when…

Read More

Nothing fishy here: Federal Court dismisses application for judicial review in PIIFCAF case

May 18, 2017

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Kirby Elson had been fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador for about 50 years when the policy on Preserving the Independence of the Inshore Fleet in Canada’s Atlantic Fisheries (“PIIFCAF”) was introduced in…

Read More

Client Update: The Cannabis Act – Getting into the Weeds

May 9, 2017

Rick Dunlop, David Randell, Christine Pound, Sadira Jan and Kevin Landry The federal government’s introduction of the Cannabis Act, the first step in the legalization of marijuana (or cannabis), has understandably triggered a wide range of reactions in the Canadian business…

Read More

The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, SNS 1996, c 7

May 9, 2017

Mark Tector and Annie Gray On April 26, 2017, the Government of Nova Scotia announced that amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, which were passed in May of 2016, will officially come into force as of June…

Read More

Client Update: CPP disability benefits are deductible from awards for loss of earning capacity and loss of income in MVA claims

May 4, 2017

On May 2, 2017, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal issued a significant decision in Tibbetts v. Murphy, 2017 NSCA 35, on the proper interpretation of s. 113A of the Insurance Act. Specifically the issue was whether…

Read More

Protests and injunctions: is the presence of journalists a material fact for the court?

April 24, 2017

Joe Thorne and Amanda Whitehead A fundamental principle of our legal system is that all parties to a dispute should be given the opportunity to be heard. However, the law recognizes that some circumstances warrant speedy judicial…

Read More

Damages for minor injuries in Nova Scotia: a new case on the new cap

April 20, 2017

Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…

Read More

The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – “You gotta have (good) faith” … Terminating without notice during the probationary period

April 19, 2017

Grant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…

Read More

Municipality liable for failing to ensure visitor was reasonably safe in Municipal Public Park

April 19, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top