Skip to content

New Brunswick regulator seeks input on revised proposed rule under Unclaimed Property Act

Christopher Marr, TEP and Level Chan with the assistance of Annelise Harnanan (summer student)

On May 20, 2021, the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission (“FCNB”) released a revised version of one of its proposed rules (“Revised Rule”) under the Unclaimed Property Act (“the Act”). As detailed in our previous client update, the Act aims to reconnect New Brunswickers with their forgotten or lost assets, and to release holders of lost assets from any liability with respect to those assets, by allowing lost assets to be transferred to the Director of Unclaimed Property. The Act received Royal Assent in March 2020 and will come into force once the associated rules are finalized.¹

FCNB first published draft rules for comment in September 2020, and received 14 comments from businesses and other organizations. The Revised Rule was prepared by FCNB in response to those comments, and includes the following significant changes:

Changes to the categories of property that are excluded from application of the Act

  • Property held in a safe deposit box by a provincially regulated credit union, trust company, caisse populaire or federal financial institution, was clarified to include all property held in safekeeping by any of the foregoing institutions (s. 3(1)(c)).
  • Property that is an insurance policy and is deemed non-payable due to an exclusion permitted by the Insurance Act, and property that is held by a federal institution as defined in the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (Canada) were added as new categories of excluded property (s. 3(f) and (g)).

Distinguishing between registered accounts and non-registered accounts

  • The time periods for property to be considered unclaimed set out in Section 5 of the Revised Rule now treat property held in a registered plan and property held outside of registered plans as distinct categories (s. 5(1)-(2)). A period of three years remains the general rule, however the Revised Rule clarifies when that period starts.

Increasing the fair market value of property that is not required to be reported or delivered

  • The Revised Rule increases the baseline amount for when holders of unclaimed property do not need to submit an unclaimed property report or deliver the associated unclaimed property to the Director of the new program to $1,000. Now, under s. 6(1), a holder may not have to submit a report or deliver the unclaimed property if:
  1. the total fair market value of the property from the previous five years is less than $1,000; and
  2. each individual property has a fair market value of less than $50.

Amendments adding registered disability savings plans and tax-free savings accounts

  • Other registered accounts, such as tax free savings accounts and registered disability savings plans, were added to the Revised Rule (s. 5(2)).

With respect to registered pension plans, the Revised Rule continues to provide that the Act only applies to a wound-up pension plan but not an ongoing pension plan. FCNB said they may consider measures for ongoing pension plans at a later date. The Revised Rule also continues to exclude benefits from an ongoing accident, disability or sickness insurance policy.

FCNB has invited stakeholders to submit their comments on the Revised Rule during a 30-day period, ending on June 19, 2021. Written submissions may be sent to:

Secretary
Financial and Consumer Services Commission
85 Charlotte Street, Suite 300
Saint John, N.B.   E2L 2J2
Telephone:    506‐658‐3060
Toll Free:   866‐933‐2222
Fax:     506‐658‐3059
E‐mail:    information@fcnb.ca


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


¹ See this note published by the FCNB regarding unclaimed property.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

TTC’s Random Testing Decision: A Bright Light for Employers in the Haze of Marijuana Legalization

April 11, 2017

Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…

Read More

Unionization in the Construction Industry: Vacation Day + Snapshot Rule = Disenfranchisement

April 4, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…

Read More

Sometimes a bad deal is just a bad deal: unconscionability and insurance claim settlements in Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13

March 16, 2017

Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…

Read More

Privilege Prevails: Privacy Commissioner protects solicitor-client communications

March 16, 2017

Jonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Nova Scotia Teachers Union & Government – a synopsis

March 7, 2017

Peter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…

Read More

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong: The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador weighs in on the former client rule in commercial transactions

March 1, 2017

Bruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…

Read More

The Ordinary Meaning of Insurance: Client Update on the SCC’s Decision in Sabean

February 21, 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top