Government of Newfoundland and Labrador creates protected leave of absence amidst COVID-19
On March 26, 2020, the Newfoundland House of Assembly met with a minimum quorum of members to table and pass Bill 33 – COVID-19 Pandemic Response Act (“Act”).
This omnibus bill amended a number of pieces of legislation, including the Labour Standards Act. The amendments added Part VII.8 – Communicable Disease Emergency Leave (“Part”) to the Act, and set a retroactive commencement date for the amendments to the Act as March 14, 2020.
With respect to designated communicable diseases, of which COVID-19 is expected to be one, this Part creates an entitlement, upon presentation of reasonable evidence, to an unpaid leave of absence where employees are unable to perform their duties in situations where an employee is:
- under medical investigation, supervision, or treatment;
- acting in accordance with an order under the Public Health Protection and Promotion Act;
- in isolation, quarantine, or under any control measure issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health;
- under an employer’s direction in response to a concern that the employee may expose others in the workplace;
- providing care or support to family, including such situations as school or child care service closure; or
- affected by travel restrictions and, under the circumstances, cannot reasonably be expected to travel back to the province.
However, the amendment provides for classes of employees to be exempted by regulation.
The amendments protect employees who take, apply for, or intend to take this leave of absence, but the period of absence will not count towards the application of rights, benefits, and privileges addressed in the Act, unless explicitly agreed upon by the employer and the employee. However, upon the conclusion of the leave of absence, all rights, benefits, and privileges addressed in the Act will resume and will be deemed to be continuous with the period of work before the leave taken.
These amendments suggest an intention to create protections for employees who have to take leave as a result of COVID-19, including those who contract the virus as well as those who have to care for family due to the resulting circumstances. However, employers and employees alike anxiously await regulations which are expected to determine that COVID-19 is a designated communicable disease under the Act, and provide any employee classes who are to be exempted from this leave.
This article is provided for general information only.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…
Read MoreJonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…
Read MoreBruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…
Read MoreIn preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3 the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…
Read More