Skip to content

Final cannabis edibles, topicals and extracts regulations released

Kevin Landry

On June 14, 2019, Health Canada announced the release of the final version of amendments to the Cannabis Regulations, which will permit for the production and sale of edibles, extracts and topicals.

The announcement follows recent changes to the cannabis licensing regime and was preceded by a 60-day consultation period on the strict regulation of additional cannabis products that opened in December 2018 (see our articled titled Canada’s Proposed Cannabis Edibles, Extracts and Topicals Regulations Revealed for more information).  

The announcement came with the release of a document titled Final Regulations for New Cannabis Products: Edible Cannabis, Cannabis Extracts and Cannabis Topicals.

What has changed from the proposed regulations?

Implementation and important dates

Several important deadlines were noted in the announcement:

  1. June 26, 2019 – the amendments to the Cannabis Regulations will be published in the Canada Gazette Part II.
  2. July 15, 2019 – license holders may submit requests for license amendments to permit production and sale of edibles, topicals and extracts. For processors licensed to sell already it is expected that amendments will be completed within 60 days.
  3. October 17, 2019 – edibles, extracts and topicals amendments to the Cannabis Regulations will take effect. Edibles, extracts and topicals will be added to Schedule 4 of the Cannabis Act and will be permitted as new classes of cannabis. Written notice of new edible, extract or topical cannabis products may be given to Health Canada pursuant to s. 244 of the Cannabis Regulations.
  4. December 16, 2019 – earliest date new products will be available for sale due to the 60-day notice period in s. 244 of the Cannabis Regulations.

Separate facilities required

The final regulations prohibit any class of cannabis from being manufactured at the same “site” as food products. It should be noted that the definition of “site” in the Cannabis Regulations is defined as an “area that is used exclusively by the holder (of the license) and that consists of at least one building or one part of a building”.

THC limits

Multi-packs of edible and drinkable cannabis will be permitted in the final regulations. The total quantity of THC in any multi-pack must not exceed 10 milligrams, and the total size of the multi-pack must not exceed 30 grams of dried cannabis or equivalent. Multi-packs will need to be comprised of discrete units that are consistent except for flavor and colour.

Packaging and labelling restrictions

Fold out panels permitted on labels

Panels can be provided on packages if the product is too small to provide all the required information but cannot display additional brand elements.

Equivalency and concentration to be included on labels

An “equivalency to dried cannabis” calculation in line with the deemed conversion table in s. 21(3) of the Cannabis Regulations will be required on every label in order to allow consumers to facilitate consumer compliance with personal possession limits.

THC and CBD concentrations have been standardized and must be displayed on packages in “milligrams per gram”.

Pressurized containers permitted

The proposed prohibition on pressurized containers (e.g. metered-dose inhalers) will not form part of the final Regulations, as pressurized containers are subject to controls to regulate their safety under the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act.

Further promotion restrictions

Association with flavours

Additional restrictions have been added to prevent promotion or images on labels of cannabis extracts, or cannabis accessories containing cannabis extracts that associate those products with flavours listed in the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act such as confectionary, dessert, soft drinks and energy drinks.

Creating health impressions

Restrictions were also added to prevent promotions or images on labels that creates an impression that:

  1. health or cosmetic benefits may be derived from the service or the use of cannabis or a cannabis accessory.
  2. edible cannabis meets particular dietary requirements for young persons, or those:
    1. with a physiological condition as a result of a disease, disorder or injury;
    2. for whom a particular effect, including weight loss, is to be obtained by a controlled intake of food;

No association with alcohol, tobacco or vaping products

Promotions or labels associating cannabis products with alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, or vaping products are prohibited.

Promotions at age-gated events cannot be seen or heard outside event

New restrictions clarify that promotions in places where “young persons are not permitted by law” may not be audible or visible to young persons from outside the age-gated event.

Limitations on promotional items (swag)

In addition to current restrictions on utilizing items appealing to youth or associated with daring or adventurous lifestyles, any swag would now be limited to the display of only 1 brand element on a particular item. Further, the brand element will be restricted in size to an area equal to or smaller than 300 cm² and no letter may be larger than 4 cm high.

Display of brand elements

The amendments also restrict display of brand elements on any item that is “in a school, a public playground, a daycare facility or any other public place frequented mainly by young persons, or is visible from such a place”.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Cannabis group.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

TTC’s Random Testing Decision: A Bright Light for Employers in the Haze of Marijuana Legalization

April 11, 2017

Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…

Read More

Unionization in the Construction Industry: Vacation Day + Snapshot Rule = Disenfranchisement

April 4, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…

Read More

Sometimes a bad deal is just a bad deal: unconscionability and insurance claim settlements in Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13

March 16, 2017

Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…

Read More

Privilege Prevails: Privacy Commissioner protects solicitor-client communications

March 16, 2017

Jonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Nova Scotia Teachers Union & Government – a synopsis

March 7, 2017

Peter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…

Read More

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong: The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador weighs in on the former client rule in commercial transactions

March 1, 2017

Bruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…

Read More

The Ordinary Meaning of Insurance: Client Update on the SCC’s Decision in Sabean

February 21, 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top